23andMe to Layoff 14% of Employees

I saw this last night on Facebook – https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/23/23andme-lays-off-100-people-ceo-anne-wojcicki-explains-why.html.

Key Points
  • 23andMe is laying off 100 people, as consumer DNA tests are down.
  • CEO Anne Wojcicki didn’t have a clear explanation for that, but cited a variety of factors, including both recession fears and privacy concerns.
  • Wojcicki said she anticipated that DNA testing would explode when she co-founded the business in 2007, but is now looking ahead to a retracting market.

Home DNA-testing company 23andMe is laying off about 100 people, or 14% of its staff, on Thursday, in the wake of declining sales.

The layoffs include the operations teams, which were focused on the company’s growth and scaling efforts, as well as other teams. In the coming months, the company plans to tighten its focus on the direct-to-consumer business and its therapeutics arm while scaling back its clinical studies arm.

CEO Anne Wojcicki told CNBC she’s been “surprised” to see the market starting to turn.

Wojcicki has theories, but she doesn’t have clear proof for why consumers are shying away from getting tests that reveal their percentage of Irish heritage, propensity for a favorite ice cream flavor, or whether they have a limited set of variants that are associated with breast cancer. Either way, she notes, she’s downsizing because it’s “what the market is ready for.”

“This has been slow and painful for us,” she said.

Wojcicki notes that privacy could be a factor. Fears about people’s DNA ending up in the wrong hands might have been heightened in the aftermath of the Golden State Killer case. Criminal investigations honed in on a suspect involved in a decades-old rapes and murders by running DNA found at the scene through a free online database where anyone who got their DNA tested through a company like 23andMe could upload it. A suspect was found because a distant relative had shared their genetic information — showing how DNA data, unlike other kinds of data, is unique because it’s linked to and potentially exposes information about family members.


She acknowledges that “privacy is top of mind” both for consumers and her executive team. She said the company hired a new chief security officer, who previously ran security at Okta, earlier this week.

“I think the tech world needs to own this better communicate privacy standards to build trust,” she said. “I want to jump in and really own it.”

Wojcicki said another factor could be that people fear an economic downturn, and they don’t want to spend a few hundred dollars on a genetic test. That might make it expensive for 23andMe to acquire customers via social media platforms like Facebook, if the early adopters have already bought tests and the next potential batch of users are reluctant to spend.



Correction: The layoffs affect 23andMe’s operations team, as well as other groups.


About ICT Genealogist

Originally from Gulfport, Mississippi. Live in Wichita, Kansas now. I suffer Bipolar I, ultra-ultra rapid cycling, mixed episodes. Blog on a variety of topics - genealogy, DNA, mental health, among others. Let's collaborateDealspotr.com
This entry was posted in Bloggers, DNA, Social Media and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 23andMe to Layoff 14% of Employees

  1. allenrizzi says:

    Consumer DNA tests seem to have run their course as a fad of sorts. More and more people are wondering if all that DNA will eventually find its way to the government, despite claims to the contrary. Personally I favor in-depth research over DNA for the vast amount of projects.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The problem with in-depth research is the large number of Not the Parent(s) Expected you run into which are often only found after a DNA test that shows Person A is not the parent of Person B. I regularly see cases where this happens. It could be an affair, a case of mistaking who the father or mother is for various reasons, rape, stealing a child from a hospital or worse, kidnapping a pregnant woman and killing her after the child is born since hospitals have implemented measures to stop stealing children from them. That’s not including the cases of adoptions where the adopted parents don’t tell the children.

      The concern about the government is valid. Good example was a case recently where a cop and prosecutor convinced a judge to allow full access to a DNA database without restriction instead of limiting it to the specific person they thought was the key. The Department of Justice has added limits that apply to those agencies who get DOJ funding, but that leaves a number of law enforcement agencies who don’t get DOJ funding free to do their own thing.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.