The choice that really isn’t — The Legal Genealogist

GEDmatch opt out is an illusion Dealing with privacy issues when it comes to DNA databases created for genealogical purposes is like trying to nail jello to a tree. 1,072 more words

via The choice that really isn’t — The Legal Genealogist.

Cite/link to this post: Judy G. Russell, “The choice that really isn’t,” The Legal Genealogist (https://www.legalgenealogist.com/blog : posted 22 May 2019).

After reading this post, I changed my Public opt-out kit to Research only as I find this a disturbing revelation. I have also seen some claim it’s not smoke and mirrors, but I trust Judy G. Russell’s assessment as her legal background is extensive.

Only time will tell how this is going to play out as I am confident that one or more people who have been arrested through the use of GEDmatch, FamilyTree DNA (FTDNA), and other companies will challenge the arrests. It may take a while before the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) hears a case, but at some point, it will be heard. Hard to say how they will rule as I have seen them rule both ways in numerous other cases. I am not a fan of ignoring our Constitution to make arrests.

About ICT Genealogist

Originally from Gulfport, Mississippi. Live in Wichita, Kansas now. Let's collaborateDealspotr.com
Quote | This entry was posted in Autosomal DNA, Bloggers, DNA, FamilyTree DNA and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.