Standard Disclaimer:
I am not an attorney and any comments I post are not intended, nor should they be construed, as legal advice. If you need legal advice, please consult a legal expert who is familiar with the area of legal expertise you need.
Thank you to Debbie of Cruwys News for sharing this article: DNA evidence and miscarriages of justice https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073818307436. You can download the article as a PDF.
I included the various topics mentioned in the article as well as a brief synopsis of the key points mentioned in the article.
Here I describe several proven miscarriages of justice have occurred: contamination; background DNA; secondary transfer and the database trawl. Two examples of dangerous practice are provided: DNA as sole evidence and qualitative reporting.
1. Context matters 2. A case example of forensic laboratory contamination
3. A case example of background DNA
4. A case example of secondary transfer
5. A case example of a database trawl leading to wrongful arrest
6. Dangers of qualitative reporting of complex mixtures
7. The problem of DNA as sole evidence
8. Conclusion
Pingback: Exclusive: The FBI Had Already Accessed Family Tree DNA’s Database Before Cooperation | Ups and Downs of Family History V2.0
Pingback: Opt-out is not informed consent — The Legal Genealogist | Ups and Downs of Family History V2.0
Pingback: My Take on FamilyTree DNA and GEDmatch Law Enforcement Policies | Ups and Downs of Family History V2.0
Pingback: Facing DNA Privacy Concerns Head-On With Informed Consent — The Genetic Genealogist | Ups and Downs of Family History V2.0
Pingback: GEDmatch E-mail Update September 16, 2019 | Ups and Downs of Family History V2.0
Pingback: GEDmatch E-mail Update September 16, 2019 | Ups and Downs of Family History V2.0